By Yochonon Donn – Hamodia
It was built at the turn of the century, just when Brooklyn was accepting its first spillover Jews from Manhattan’s Lower East Side and just four years after Boro Park got its name.
Temple Beth El was Boro Park’s first shul, and at the grand old age of 113 is just a year younger than the oldest building built to be a shul in the entire Brooklyn.
Today known as Chevra Anshei Lubawitz, it is one of the borough’s only surviving examples of tenement-style architectures, with imposing stair towers capped by Moorish spires and topped with large Magen David stars.
The shul has been embroiled these past four years in a battle for its survival, after developers surreptitiously purchased the site and obtained permits to raze the historic building and repurpose it for condominium housing.
The developers are saying they will allow space in the new building for prayers, but an association of mispallelim, local Rabbanim and activists, as well as the city’s incoming public advocate is calling on the city to grant Anshei Lubawitz landmark status. The label brands the building as an historic site, and makes tampering with its infrastructure nearly impossible.
“We write to you on behalf of ourselves — and the Jewish community of Boro Park — to request that the Landmarks Preservation Commission consider the Chevra Anshei Lubawitz Synagogue … for designation as an individual landmark,” write Joseph and Levi Goldberg, mispallelim of the shul for over 70 years and nephews of one of the shul’s early Rabbanim.
“The synagogue,” the letter appeals to Sarah Carroll, who chairs the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission, “has great significance to the Jewish history of Boro Park, and also for the history of Brooklyn, and is believed to be the oldest undesignated purpose-built synagogue still in synagogue use in Brooklyn.”
The request was accompanied by over a dozen letters, including from Rabbi Yehuda Krinsky of Chabad, Rabbanim, mispallelim, historians and local activists, as well as local elected officials such as Councilmen Brad Lander and Carlos Menchaca.
The Bangladeshi American Friendship Society of North America also added its voice to the request, saying the shul was the first “in a neighborhood that grew into one of the most important Jewish communities in New York and the country.”
Jumaane Williams, a councilman who represents the area and the newly elected city public advocate, penned his own letter late Monday, writing that he is familiar with the shul and its historic significance.
“Chevra Anshe Lubawitz … was the first synagogue in a neighborhood that grew into one of the most important Jewish communities not only [in] New York but the nation,” Williams said in his missive. “It is my strong belief that this location should be landmarked and preserved as a piece of history and a cultural cornerstone.”
The shul, located at 4024 12th Ave., was constructed in 1906, just when New York’s Orthodox community was beginning to move across the Williamsburg Bridge into Brooklyn. It originally housed Temple Beth El but was sold in 1922 to Lubavitch, making it even older than the main Chabad headquarters at 770 Eastern Parkway in nearby Crown Heights. It was erected a year after Brooklyn’s oldest surviving shul, Congregation Ahavas Israel in Greenpoint.
The Lubavitcher Rebbe, Harav Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn, zt”l, made Anshe Lubawitz one of his first stops while visiting the United States in 1929 and his words are embedded in the shul’s cornerstone.
Joseph Goldberg recalled how back in the 1950s he blew the shofar on Rosh Hashanah in the shul, which was “packed from wall to wall with worshippers.” He said that Yeshivah Toras Emes, Boro Park’s first elementary yeshivah, had its beginnings in the shul when the need for a yeshivah in the neighborhood became apparent in the 1930s.
“The Jewish history of Brooklyn is enormously significant both to Brooklyn and to the general Jewish community,” Goldberg wrote in his petition. “Yet there is currently just one Brooklyn synagogue that has been granted landmark status. Anshe Lubawitz is an excellent candidate for increasing that number.”
Read the full Request for Evaluation to the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission report here.
answer to #8, the shul belongs to the mispalilim not to you, is is us who will decide what the best interest is not you, your interest is to sell it and build condos and make money on our back, we loved the shul and you came only to destroy it, you stoled from us whats not yours, and bezras hashem we will get it back,
Unfortunatly today you can’t trust too many people especially when it comes to money. I agree with the commentator who told the obvious truth. If they were sincere about replacing the shul then why did they not put money aside in escrow for that purpose and then build the shul with apartments above. Something is fishy.
Even if it’s allowed halachically, there is something about it’s antiquity that makes it worth being preserved. It’s the oldest shul in Boro Park.
Needs repair? So, just make the repair! Tell the truth! is it really in danger of collapse?
Landmark Shtus? Woe!!! Take a look at this, about the Rambam’s shul in Cairo:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maimonides_Synagogue
“Yeshivah Toras Emes, Boro Park’s first elementary yeshivah, had its beginnings in the shul when the need for a yeshivah in the neighborhood became apparent in the 1930s.”
Toras Emes was not the first elementary yeshiva of B.P. It was preceded by Yeshiva Etz Chaim (aka Hebrew Institute of Borough Park) which started in the teen years.
my answer to # 123 – who is ” the shul” what do u mean u dont know the shul is falling apart . most of the neighbors dont walk even once a month . obviously the person making the deal had some kind of rights ..if you thought selling the shul is a good idea you wouldnt put it out for opinions of people who are not major players in the shul you get it done . whoever the guy selling it ( i have no idea who he is) doesnt owe the people using his place anything. as… Read more »
First of all, the developer was given a sweet heart deal. He basically took the property for free since no money exchanged hands. The property was given to him based on a promise that he would build a new synagogue in the future. There is no timeline, or protection for the synagogue. And even the so called purchase price was way below market value. Whoever organized the deal on behalf of the synagogue is incompetent or corrupt. The whole thing smells. You claim to be a normal level headed person so please answer the questions.below . 1. Why was the… Read more »
i live on 40 street have nothing at all to do w/ the developer nor do i plan on buying the condo’s . i am a very normal level headed baal habos , with a soft spot for chabad as well BUT i play fair and when a good idea makes sense i support it
It’s one thing that’s ok that happened a month ago where the only reform non orthodox temple sold out and got knocked down in one day for condos. Right now in Boro park there is a mad rush to build buildings with numerous condos. It’s happening in Jerusalem as well. In fact right near shop rite supermarket they are building 10 story buildings with over 200 aptms. The people who want to destroy this shul on 12 ave are not interested in a shul. They want fast money. Build multi floors and charge crazy prices for each apartment sale. It’s… Read more »
Comment Number three must be coming from the developer and his associates the shul was in heavy use and I was much appreciated by all the neighbors, There were two mispalem who came from a nearby shul about two or three years ago and cozied up to the president with the intention of building condos and getting Rich , this is an absolute travesty
basicly the old shul was bankrupt , very few minyanim and in need of major repair – so someone had the bright idea of building condos with a beautiful new ground floor beis medrash that would be a win win for all and some nudniks are stalling the project with nonsense landmark shtusim 99.9% of bp residents have never and dont step into the shul even for a mariv
It is great to see that the desecration of this holy temple is not going unnoticed
Isn’t it assur to destroy shul? Shouldn’t these developers be put in Cherem or something?